Problem
You have n orders, each with a pickup event Pi and a delivery event Di. Every pickup must happen before its corresponding delivery. Count how many valid orderings of all 2n events exist, and return the answer modulo 10^9 + 7.
For n = 2 (orders P1/D1 and P2/D2):
- Input:
n = 2 - Output:
6 - Explanation: The six valid sequences are [P1,P2,D1,D2], [P1,P2,D2,D1], [P2,P1,D1,D2], [P2,P1,D2,D1], [P1,D1,P2,D2], and [P2,D2,P1,D1].
A sequence like [D1,P1,P2,D2] is invalid because D1 appears before P1.
Intuition
Think about building the sequence one order at a time. After placing i-1 orders (occupying 2i-2 slots), there are 2i-1 gaps where you could insert the next pickup. Once the pickup is placed, the delivery must go in one of the slots that comes after it. Counting those choices multiplicatively gives a clean O(n) formula: each new order i multiplies the count by i ร (2i - 1).
Solution โ Mathematical DP
Build the answer incrementally. For each new order i, count the ways to insert its pickup and delivery into the existing sequence of 2(i-1) items, then multiply into a running total.
- Start with
result = 1andMOD = 10^9 + 7. - For each order index
ifrom 1 ton:- After placing
i-1orders, there are2itotal slots (the2i-2filled slots plus the 2 we are about to fill). - The pickup
Pican go in any of2i-1gaps (before, between, or after the existing2i-2items). - Once
Piis placed, the deliveryDimust go in a slot afterPi; on average there areisuch positions (the formulai*(2i-1)captures both choices together, derived as(2i)*(2i-1)/2). - Multiply
resultbyi * (2i - 1), taken moduloMOD.
- After placing
- Return
result.
1def countOrders(n: int) -> int:
2 MOD = 10**9 + 7
3 result = 1
4 for order_index in range(1, n + 1):
5 # Ways to slot pickup Pi and delivery Di into the existing sequence.
6 # (2*order_index slots total, pickup before delivery) = order_index * (2*order_index - 1)
7 result = result * order_index * (2 * order_index - 1) % MOD
8 return resultTime: O(n) โ one multiplication per order.
Space: O(1) โ only a running product is kept.
Complexity Summary
| Approach | Time | Space | When to use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematical DP | O(n) | O(1) | Always โ there is no better complexity; the recurrence is exact, not approximate |
Common Mistakes
- Using integer overflow without modular reduction: For n=500 the intermediate product
order_index * (2*order_index - 1)fits in 64 bits, but the runningresultdoes not โ apply% MODafter each multiplication, not only at the end. - Starting the loop at i=0 instead of i=1: The formula gives
0 * (-1) = 0at i=0, which zeroes out the entire result. The first meaningful order is i=1. - Forgetting that the modular result must stay as the running total: A common bug is computing
result = (result * factor)in Python without% MOD, which produces a astronomically large integer that still gives the right answer but defeats the purpose of modular arithmetic and is extremely slow for large n. - Deriving the per-step factor incorrectly as
(2i) * (2i-1)instead ofi * (2i-1): The full factor for inserting two ordered items into2ipositions is(2i choose 2) = i*(2i-1), not(2i)*(2i-1). Forgetting to divide by 2 double-counts every (pickup, delivery) pair. - Confusing this with a pure permutation problem: n! counts the orderings of n distinguishable orders with no pickup/delivery constraint. Adding the Pi-before-Di constraint cuts each order's choices roughly in half, producing the
(2n-1)!!factor rather than(2n)!.
Related Problems
unique-pathsโ another combinatorics problem where the answer derives from counting constrained arrangementspermutationsโ foundational enumeration of arrangements, the unconstrained baseline this problem builds oncombination-sum-iiโ constrained selection problems solved by thinking about choices at each steppermutation-sequenceโ counting and indexing into constrained permutations using factorialsunique-binary-search-treesโ the Catalan number recurrence follows the same multiplicative logic of counting constrained structural arrangements